PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930TE vs Xeon E5462 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930TE vs Xeon E5462: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930TE

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
✅Delivers 716.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Xeon E5462 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5462 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (948 vs 1,239).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5462, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon E5462

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 52.8 PassMark/$ ($342 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5462 better than Celeron G3930TE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5462 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G3930TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5462 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5462 is the stronger fit. You are getting 30.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5462 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5462 comes in 714.3% more expensive on MSRP at $342 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G3930TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 716.1% better value on paper (52.8 vs 6.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3930TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3930TE vs Xeon E5462 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930TE

The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.

Xeon E5462

The Xeon E5462 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $797.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3930TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5462 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5462 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5462 — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E5462 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron G3930TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5462 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930TE scores 2,218 against the Xeon E5462's 2,213 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G3930TE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 548 vs 363, a 40.6% lead for the Celeron G3930TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 948 vs 1,239 (26.6% advantage for the Xeon E5462). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3930TE vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5462.

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Xeon E5462
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	2.8 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	2.8 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	2 MB	12 MB L2 Cache+500%
L2 Cache	512 kB	6 MB (total)+1100%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,218	2,213
Geekbench 6 Single	548+51%	363
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	1,239+31%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5462 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930TE versus DDR2 on the Xeon E5462 — the Celeron G3930TE supports 119900% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930TE) and 5000P,3210,G31,P35 (Xeon E5462).

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Xeon E5462
Socket	LGA1151	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+119900%	DDR2
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron G3930TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Xeon E5462 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget, Xeon E5462 targets Server. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T; Xeon E5462 rivals Athlon 64 X2 4000+.

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Xeon E5462
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3930TE was priced at $42, while the Xeon E5462 came in at $342. On launch pricing ($42 vs $342), Celeron G3930TE was $300 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930TE delivers 52.8 pts/$ vs 6.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5462 — making the Celeron G3930TE the 156.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Xeon E5462
MSRP	$42-88%	$342
Performance per Dollar	52.8+712%	6.5
Release Date	2017	2007

Search Celeron G3930TE on Amazon

Search Xeon E5462 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.