Celeron G3930TE vs Pentium G3440

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930TE vs Pentium G3440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930TE vs Pentium G3440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930TE

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Pentium G3440 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Pentium G3440 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium G3440

2014

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,202 vs 2,218).
❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3930TE better than Pentium G3440?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G3440 is ahead with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3930TE pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Pentium G3440 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3930TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3930TE is the better buy right now. Celeron G3930TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Pentium G3440 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3930TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3930TE vs Pentium G3440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930TE

The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.

Pentium G3440

The Pentium G3440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,202 points. Launch price was $95.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3930TE and Pentium G3440 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE versus 3.3 GHz on the Pentium G3440 — a 20% clock advantage for the Pentium G3440 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Celeron G3930TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G3440 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930TE scores 2,218 against the Pentium G3440's 2,202 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron G3930TE. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3930TE vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3440.

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Pentium G3440
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3.3 GHz+22%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.3 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,218	2,202
Geekbench 6 Single	548	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G3440 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Pentium G3440
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3930TE) / not specified (Pentium G3440). The Celeron G3930TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Pentium G3440 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T.