Celeron G3930TE vs Celeron G4900T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930TE vs Celeron G4900T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930TE vs Celeron G4900T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930TE

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G4900T across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (948 vs 1,040).

Celeron G4900T

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4900T better than Celeron G3930TE?

Yes. Celeron G4900T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data, 9.7% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.9% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G4900T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.7% more average FPS across 37 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 9.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G4900T comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $42 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.9% better value on MSRP (53.3 vs 52.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3930TE vs Celeron G4900T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930TE

The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.

Celeron G4900T

The Celeron G4900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3930TE and Celeron G4900T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G4900T — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G4900T (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Celeron G3930TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G4900T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930TE scores 2,218 against the Celeron G4900T's 2,239 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron G4900T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 548 vs 623, a 12.8% lead for the Celeron G4900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 948 vs 1,040 (9.3% advantage for the Celeron G4900T). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3930TE vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900T.

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Celeron G4900T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	2.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	2.9 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	2 MB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	2,218	2,239
Geekbench 6 Single	548	623+14%
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	1,040+10%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930TE) and H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4900T).

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Celeron G4900T
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930TE) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4900T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget, Celeron G4900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T; Celeron G4900T rivals Pentium G5400T.

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Celeron G4900T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 610	UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3930TE was priced at $42, while the Celeron G4900T came in at $42. On launch pricing ($42 vs $42), Celeron G4900T was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930TE delivers 52.8 pts/$ vs 53.3 pts/$ for the Celeron G4900T — making the Celeron G4900T the 0.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3930TE	Celeron G4900T
MSRP	$42	$42
Performance per Dollar	52.8	53.3
Release Date	2017	2018

Search Celeron G3930TE on Amazon

Search Celeron G4900T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.