Celeron G3930TE vs Core 2 Duo E8700

Intel

Celeron G3930TE

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E8700

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G3930TE vs Core 2 Duo E8700 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930TE vs Core 2 Duo E8700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930TE vs Core 2 Duo E8700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930TE

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $214 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $256 MSRP).
  • Delivers 511.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $256 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo E8700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core 2 Duo E8700

2009

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,212 vs 2,218).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 52.8 PassMark/$ ($256 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3930TE better than Core 2 Duo E8700?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E8700 is ahead with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3930TE pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3930TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G3930TE is the better buy right now. Celeron G3930TE comes in $214 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $256 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo E8700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 511.2% better value on MSRP (52.8 vs 8.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3930TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3930TE vs Core 2 Duo E8700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G3930TE

The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8700

The Core 2 Duo E8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,212 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3930TE and Core 2 Duo E8700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE versus 3.5 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8700 — a 25.8% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8700 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Celeron G3930TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8700 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930TE scores 2,218 against the Core 2 Duo E8700's 2,212 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G3930TE.

FeatureCeleron G3930TECore 2 Duo E8700
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
3.5 GHz+30%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.5 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
6 MB (total)+1100%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
2,218
2,212
Geekbench 6 Single
548
Geekbench 6 Multi
948
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G3930TECore 2 Duo E8700
Socket
LGA1151
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3930TE) / not specified (Core 2 Duo E8700). The Celeron G3930TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Core 2 Duo E8700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T.

FeatureCeleron G3930TECore 2 Duo E8700
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3930TE was priced at $42, while the Core 2 Duo E8700 came in at $256. On launch pricing ($42 vs $256), Celeron G3930TE was $214 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930TE delivers 52.8 pts/$ vs 8.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8700 — making the Celeron G3930TE the 143.8% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G3930TECore 2 Duo E8700
MSRP
$42-84%
$256
Performance per Dollar
52.8+514%
8.6
Release Date
2017
2009

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.