Celeron G3930TE vs Core i3-3210
Celeron G3930TE
Core i3-3210
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G3930TE is positioned at rank 403 and the Core i3-3210 is on rank 814, so the Celeron G3930TE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3930TE
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3210
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G3930TE | Core i3-3210 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($29) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G3930TE | Core i3-3210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+17%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($29) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G3930TE and Core i3-3210
Celeron G3930TE
The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.
Core i3-3210
The Core i3-3210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,229 points. Launch price was $120.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3930TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-3210's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-3210 — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-3210 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Celeron G3930TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-3210 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930TE scores 2,218 against the Core i3-3210's 2,229 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-3210. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 548 vs 505, a 8.2% lead for the Celeron G3930TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 948 vs 1,113 (16% advantage for the Core i3-3210). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3930TE vs 3072 kB (total) on the Core i3-3210.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Core i3-3210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 3072 kB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,218 | 2,229 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 548+9% | 505 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 948 | 1,113+17% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3930TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3210 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930TE versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3210 — the Celeron G3930TE supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930TE) and B75,H77 (Core i3-3210).
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Core i3-3210 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+33% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930TE) and HD Graphics 2500 (Core i3-3210) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget, Core i3-3210 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T; Core i3-3210 rivals Ryzen 3 1200.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Core i3-3210 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 610 | HD Graphics 2500 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G3930TE launched at $42 MSRP, while the Core i3-3210 debuted at $117. At current prices ($29 vs $25), the Core i3-3210 is $4 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930TE delivers 76.5 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Core i3-3210 — making the Core i3-3210 the 15.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Core i3-3210 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-64% | $117 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $29 | $25-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 76.5 | 89.2+17% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G3930TE and Core i3-3210
