
Celeron G3930TE

Core i7-3555LE
Celeron G3930TE vs Core i7-3555LE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G3930TE vs Core i7-3555LE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G3930TE vs Core i7-3555LE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G3930TE
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $258 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 607.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Core i7-3555LE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,218 vs 2,238).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.
Core i7-3555LE
2012Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 52.8 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-3555LE better than Celeron G3930TE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3930TE vs Core i7-3555LE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930TE
The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i7-3555LE
The Core i7-3555LE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,238 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3930TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-3555LE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-3555LE — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-3555LE (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron G3930TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3555LE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930TE scores 2,218 against the Core i7-3555LE's 2,238 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-3555LE. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3930TE vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3555LE.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Core i7-3555LE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+8% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,218 | 2,238 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 548 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 948 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3930TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3555LE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Core i7-3555LE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3930TE) / not specified (Core i7-3555LE). The Celeron G3930TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Core i7-3555LE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Core i7-3555LE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G3930TE was priced at $42, while the Core i7-3555LE came in at $300. On launch pricing ($42 vs $300), Celeron G3930TE was $258 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930TE delivers 52.8 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-3555LE — making the Celeron G3930TE the 150.5% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Core i7-3555LE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-86% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+604% | 7.5 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














