Celeron G3930TE vs Core i5-8200Y

Intel

Celeron G3930TE

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-8200Y

2 Cores4 Thrd5 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G3930TE vs Core i5-8200Y Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930TE vs Core i5-8200Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930TE vs Core i5-8200Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930TE

2017

Why buy it

  • 60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (548 vs 858).
  • Lower PassMark (2,218 vs 2,245).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core i5-8200Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 600% higher power demand at 35W vs 5W.

Core i5-8200Y

2018

Why buy it

  • +56.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
  • Draws 5W instead of 35W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-8200Y better than Celeron G3930TE?
Yes. Core i5-8200Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-8200Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-8200Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-8200Y is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-8200Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G3930TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (52.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-8200Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2017), 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3930TE vs Core i5-8200Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G3930TE

The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Core i5-8200Y

The Core i5-8200Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $291.

Processing Power

The Celeron G3930TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-8200Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-8200Y — a 36.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-8200Y (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron G3930TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-8200Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930TE scores 2,218 against the Core i5-8200Y's 2,245 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-8200Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 548 vs 858, a 44.1% lead for the Core i5-8200Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3930TE vs 4 MB on the Core i5-8200Y.

FeatureCeleron G3930TECore i5-8200Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
3.9 GHz+44%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+108%
1.3 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark
2,218
2,245+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
548
858+57%
Geekbench 6 Multi
948
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-8200Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930TE versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-8200Y — the Celeron G3930TE supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3930TE) vs 10 (Core i5-8200Y) — the Celeron G3930TE offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930TE) and Amber Lake-Y (Core i5-8200Y).

FeatureCeleron G3930TECore i5-8200Y
Socket
LGA1151
FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+29%
LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+300%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16+60%
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3930TE) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8200Y). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930TE) and UHD Graphics 615 (Core i5-8200Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget, Core i5-8200Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T; Core i5-8200Y rivals Athlon 300U.

FeatureCeleron G3930TECore i5-8200Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 615
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget
Tablet/2-in-1