
Celeron G3930TE

Core i5-8200Y
Celeron G3930TE vs Core i5-8200Y Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G3930TE vs Core i5-8200Y FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G3930TE vs Core i5-8200Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G3930TE
2017Why buy it
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (548 vs 858).
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,218 vs 2,245).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core i5-8200Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌600% higher power demand at 35W vs 5W.
Core i5-8200Y
2018Why buy it
- ✅+56.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Draws 5W instead of 35W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-8200Y better than Celeron G3930TE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3930TE vs Core i5-8200Y Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930TE
The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i5-8200Y
The Core i5-8200Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $291.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3930TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-8200Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-8200Y — a 36.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-8200Y (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron G3930TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-8200Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930TE scores 2,218 against the Core i5-8200Y's 2,245 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-8200Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 548 vs 858, a 44.1% lead for the Core i5-8200Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3930TE vs 4 MB on the Core i5-8200Y.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Core i5-8200Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz+44% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+108% | 1.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) |
| PassMark | 2,218 | 2,245+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 548 | 858+57% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 948 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3930TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-8200Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930TE versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-8200Y — the Celeron G3930TE supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3930TE) vs 10 (Core i5-8200Y) — the Celeron G3930TE offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930TE) and Amber Lake-Y (Core i5-8200Y).
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Core i5-8200Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1515 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+29% | LPDDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+60% | 10 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3930TE) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8200Y). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930TE) and UHD Graphics 615 (Core i5-8200Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget, Core i5-8200Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T; Core i5-8200Y rivals Athlon 300U.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Core i5-8200Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 610 | UHD Graphics 615 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget | Tablet/2-in-1 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













