
Celeron G3930TE

Pentium P6100
Celeron G3930TE vs Pentium P6100 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G3930TE vs Pentium P6100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Civilization VI
Celeron G3930TE vs Pentium P6100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G3930TE
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $58 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 22.4 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Pentium P6100 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,218 vs 2,245).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
Pentium P6100
2010Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.4 vs 52.8 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G3930TE better than Pentium P6100?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3930TE vs Pentium P6100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930TE
The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.

Pentium P6100
The Pentium P6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $12.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G3930TE and Pentium P6100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE versus 2 GHz on the Pentium P6100 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930TE (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron G3930TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium P6100 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930TE scores 2,218 against the Pentium P6100's 2,245 — a 1.2% lead for the Pentium P6100. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3930TE vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6100.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz+35% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+35% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,218 | 2,245+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 548 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 948 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3930TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium P6100 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3930TE) / not specified (Pentium P6100). The Celeron G3930TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Pentium P6100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G3930TE was priced at $42, while the Pentium P6100 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($42 vs $100), Celeron G3930TE was $58 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930TE delivers 52.8 pts/$ vs 22.4 pts/$ for the Pentium P6100 — making the Celeron G3930TE the 80.7% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3930TE | Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-58% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+136% | 22.4 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














