Celeron J3455E vs Core 2 Duo E8700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J3455E vs Core 2 Duo E8700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J3455E vs Core 2 Duo E8700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J3455E

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 500, while Core 2 Duo E8700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,193 vs 2,212).

Core 2 Duo E8700

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $256 MSRP, while Celeron J3455E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3455E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo E8700 better than Celeron J3455E?

Yes. Core 2 Duo E8700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo E8700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo E8700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo E8700 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo E8700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $256 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J3455E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J3455E vs Core 2 Duo E8700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3455E

The Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,193 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo E8700

The Core 2 Duo E8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,212 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J3455E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E8700 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J3455E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455E versus 3.5 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8700 — a 41.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8700 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8700 is built on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron J3455E scores 2,193 against the Core 2 Duo E8700's 2,212 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8700.

Feature	Celeron J3455E	Core 2 Duo E8700
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+52%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+133%
L3 Cache	2 MB	—
L2 Cache	—	6 MB (total)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	—	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	2,193	2,212
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	850	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J3455E) / not specified (Core 2 Duo E8700). The Celeron J3455E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the Core 2 Duo E8700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3455E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455E rivals Pentium J4205.