
Celeron J3455E

PRO A8-9600B
Celeron J3455E vs PRO A8-9600B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron J3455E vs PRO A8-9600B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron J3455E vs PRO A8-9600B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron J3455E
2019Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 500, while PRO A8-9600B needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,193 vs 2,195).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 10W vs 2W.
PRO A8-9600B
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 10W, a 8W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3455E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is PRO A8-9600B better than Celeron J3455E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron J3455E vs PRO A8-9600B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3455E
The Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,193 points. Launch price was $69.

PRO A8-9600B
The PRO A8-9600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,195 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron J3455E and PRO A8-9600B share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455E versus 3.3 GHz on the PRO A8-9600B — a 35.7% clock advantage for the PRO A8-9600B (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The PRO A8-9600B is built on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron J3455E scores 2,193 against the PRO A8-9600B's 2,195 — a 0.1% lead for the PRO A8-9600B.
| Feature | Celeron J3455E | PRO A8-9600B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz+60% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | — | 2048 kB |
| Process | 14 nm-50% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | — | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,193 | 2,195 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 450 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 850 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J3455E) / not specified (PRO A8-9600B). The Celeron J3455E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the PRO A8-9600B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3455E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455E rivals Pentium J4205.
| Feature | Celeron J3455E | PRO A8-9600B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 500 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Low Power | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















