Celeron J3455E vs Pentium G4400TE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J3455E vs Pentium G4400TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J3455E vs Pentium G4400TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J3455E

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 35W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Pentium G4400TE

2015

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,190 vs 2,193).
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Celeron J3455E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌250% higher power demand at 35W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J3455E better than Pentium G4400TE?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G4400TE is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J3455E pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Pentium G4400TE also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J3455E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J3455E is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron J3455E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. Pentium G4400TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (7.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J3455E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J3455E vs Pentium G4400TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3455E

The Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,193 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium G4400TE

The Pentium G4400TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,190 points. Launch price was $64.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J3455E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G4400TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J3455E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455E versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G4400TE — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G4400TE. The Pentium G4400TE is built on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron J3455E scores 2,193 against the Pentium G4400TE's 2,190 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron J3455E. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron J3455E vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4400TE.

Feature	Celeron J3455E	Pentium G4400TE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+4%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%
L2 Cache	—	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	—	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,193	2,190
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	850	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J3455E versus DDR4-2133 on the Pentium G4400TE — the Celeron J3455E supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G4400TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J3455E) vs 16 (Pentium G4400TE) — the Pentium G4400TE offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron J3455E	Pentium G4400TE
Socket	—	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+13%	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	64 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	6	16+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 500 (Celeron J3455E) and HD Graphics 510 (Pentium G4400TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3455E targets Low Power, Pentium G4400TE targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455E rivals Pentium J4205.