Celeron J3455E vs Pro A8-8600B

Celeron J3455E vs Pro A8-8600B Performance Spectrum

Celeron J3455E

4 / 4

2,193

0.0%

2,203

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J3455E vs Pro A8-8600B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J3455E vs Pro A8-8600B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J3455E

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 500, while Pro A8-8600B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,193 vs 2,203).
❌400% higher power demand at 10W vs 2W.

Pro A8-8600B

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 10W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron J3455E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3455E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pro A8-8600B better than Celeron J3455E?

Yes. Pro A8-8600B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pro A8-8600B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pro A8-8600B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pro A8-8600B is the better buy right now. Pro A8-8600B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J3455E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J3455E vs Pro A8-8600B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3455E

The Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,193 points. Launch price was $69.

Pro A8-8600B

The Pro A8-8600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,203 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J3455E and Pro A8-8600B share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455E versus 3 GHz on the Pro A8-8600B — a 26.4% clock advantage for the Pro A8-8600B (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Pro A8-8600B is built on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron J3455E scores 2,193 against the Pro A8-8600B's 2,203 — a 0.5% lead for the Pro A8-8600B.

Feature	Celeron J3455E	Pro A8-8600B
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3 GHz+30%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	1.6 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	2 MB	—
L2 Cache	—	2048 kB
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	—	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,193	2,203
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	850	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J3455E) / not specified (Pro A8-8600B). The Celeron J3455E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the Pro A8-8600B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3455E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455E rivals Pentium J4205.