Core 2 Duo P7370
VS
Celeron J3455E

Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Celeron J3455E

Intel

Core 2 Duo P7370

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 2 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron J3455E

4 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core 2 Duo P7370 is positioned at rank #512 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P7370

#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
100%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
99%
#500
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
670%
#501
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
660%
#502
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
606%
#503
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
603%
#504
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
597%
#506
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
577%
#507
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
553%
#508
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
552%
#509
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
537%
#512
Core 2 Duo P7370
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J3455E (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Duo P7370Celeron J3455E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo P7370 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Duo P7370Celeron J3455E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo P7370 and Celeron J3455E

Intel

Core 2 Duo P7370

The Core 2 Duo P7370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,191 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Celeron J3455E

The Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,193 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo P7370 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J3455E offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J3455E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7370 versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455E — a 14% clock advantage for the Celeron J3455E (base: 2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P7370 is built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P7370 scores 2,191 against the Celeron J3455E's 2,193 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron J3455E. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P7370 vs 2 MB on the Celeron J3455E.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P7370Celeron J3455E
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.3 GHz+15%
Base Clock
2 GHz+33%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB L2 Cache+50%
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,191
2,193
Geekbench 6 Single
450
Geekbench 6 Multi
850
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo P7370 versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J3455E — the Celeron J3455E supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo P7370) vs 6 (Celeron J3455E) — the Core 2 Duo P7370 offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core 2 Duo P7370) and N/A (SoC) (Celeron J3455E).

FeatureCore 2 Duo P7370Celeron J3455E
Socket
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+167%
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Core 2 Duo P7370) vs VT-x (Celeron J3455E). The Celeron J3455E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3455E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455E rivals Pentium J4205.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P7370Celeron J3455E
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 500
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
VT-x
Target Use
Low Power