Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo P7370

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 3W instead of 95W, a 92W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).

Core 2 Quad Q9505

2009

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,176 vs 2,191).
❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo P7370 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3066.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 3W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo P7370 better than Core 2 Quad Q9505?

Yes. Core 2 Duo P7370 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo P7370 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P7370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo P7370 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core 2 Duo P7370 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Quad Q9505 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (10.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 2 Quad Q9505 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo P7370

The Core 2 Duo P7370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,191 points. Launch price was $249.

Core 2 Quad Q9505

The Core 2 Quad Q9505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo P7370 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9505 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7370 versus 0.83 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 — a 82.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P7370 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.83 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P7370 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P7370 scores 2,191 against the Core 2 Quad Q9505's 2,176 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo P7370. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P7370 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Quad Q9505.

Feature	Core 2 Duo P7370	Core 2 Quad Q9505
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2 GHz+141%	0.83 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.83 GHz+42%
L3 Cache	3 MB L2 Cache	6 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache	3 MB	6 MB (total)+100%
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Yorkfield (2007−2009)
PassMark	2,191	2,176

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo P7370 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo P7370 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 — the Core 2 Quad Q9505 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Quad Q9505 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo P7370) vs 0 (Core 2 Quad Q9505) — the Core 2 Duo P7370 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core 2 Duo P7370	Core 2 Quad Q9505
Socket	PGA478	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Core 2 Duo P7370) vs VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q9505). Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q9505 targets Desktop.