Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Pro A10-8700B

Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Pro A10-8700B Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Duo P7370

2 / 2

2,191

+1.0%

2,170

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Pro A10-8700B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Pro A10-8700B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo P7370

2009

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pro A10-8700B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌50% higher power demand at 3W vs 2W.

Pro A10-8700B

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 3W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,170 vs 2,191).

Quick Answers

So, is Pro A10-8700B better than Core 2 Duo P7370?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pro A10-8700B is ahead with a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P7370 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P7370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pro A10-8700B still makes the most sense overall. Pro A10-8700B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pro A10-8700B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Pro A10-8700B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo P7370

The Core 2 Duo P7370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,191 points. Launch price was $249.

Pro A10-8700B

The Pro A10-8700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,170 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo P7370 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pro A10-8700B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A10-8700B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7370 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pro A10-8700B — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Pro A10-8700B (base: 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P7370 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pro A10-8700B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P7370 scores 2,191 against the Pro A10-8700B's 2,170 — a 1% lead for the Core 2 Duo P7370.

Feature	Core 2 Duo P7370	Pro A10-8700B
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2 GHz	3.2 GHz+60%
Base Clock	2 GHz+11%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB L2 Cache	—
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2048 kB
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,191	2,170

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo P7370 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pro A10-8700B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.