Core 2 Duo T5670 vs Core i3-7100H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo T5670 vs Core i3-7100H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo T5670 vs Core i3-7100H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo T5670

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-7100H across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,440 vs 3,450).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7100H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-7100H

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Core 2 Duo T5670 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7100H better than Core 2 Duo T5670?

Yes. Core i3-7100H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 31 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-7100H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.0% more average FPS across 31 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7100H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7100H still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-7100H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 31 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7100H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2008), 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo T5670 vs Core i3-7100H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo T5670

The Core 2 Duo T5670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 3,440 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i3-7100H

The Core i3-7100H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,450 points. Launch price was $393.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T5670 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-7100H's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5670 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-7100H — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-7100H (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T5670 uses the Merom-2M (2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-7100H uses Kaby Lake-H (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5670 scores 3,440 against the Core i3-7100H's 3,450 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-7100H. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5670 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100H.

Feature	Core 2 Duo T5670	Core i3-7100H
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.8 GHz+56%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3 GHz+67%
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	2 MB	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	65 nm	14 nm-78%
Architecture	Merom-2M (2008)	Kaby Lake-H (2017)
PassMark	3,440	3,450
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,011

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo T5670) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7100H). The Core i3-7100H includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Core 2 Duo T5670 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7100H rivals Ryzen 3 2300U.