Core 2 Duo T5750
VS
Athlon 64 X2 5800+

Core 2 Duo T5750 vs Athlon 64 X2 5800+

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5750

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

2 Cores2 Thrd89 WWMax: 3 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T5750 is positioned at rank 28 and the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is on rank 1037, so the Core 2 Duo T5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5750

#16
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
169%
#17
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
166%
#18
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
153%
#19
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
152%
#20
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
151%
#22
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
145%
#23
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
139%
#24
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
139%
#25
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
136%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
100%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
99%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
98%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
98%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
98%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
96%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
89%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
88%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5800+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
41069%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
38806%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
28177%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8488%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6724%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5882%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3369%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3325%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3027%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3027%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2993%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2913%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2872%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2860%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2834%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
100%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
100%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
100%
#1040
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
99%
#1041
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
99%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
98%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
96%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
94%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
93%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
92%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
92%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
91%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
90%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo T5750 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo T5750Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($8)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Brisbane (2007−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core 2 Duo T5750 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $8 (vs $20), it costs 60% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 149% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Athlon 64 X2 5800+.
InsightCore 2 Duo T5750Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+149%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($8)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T5750 and Athlon 64 X2 5800+

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5750

The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,745 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo T5750 and Athlon 64 X2 5800+ share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 versus 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ — a 40% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. The Core 2 Duo T5750 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses Brisbane (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5750 scores 1,738 against the Athlon 64 X2 5800+'s 1,745 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5750 vs 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5750Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3 GHz+50%
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Brisbane (2007−2008)
PassMark
1,738
1,745
Geekbench 6 Single
360
Geekbench 6 Multi
680
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T5750 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T5750) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5800+).

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5750Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Socket
PGA478
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
16 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Core 2 Duo T5750) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5800+). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5750Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

At current prices ($8 vs $20), the Core 2 Duo T5750 is $12 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo T5750 delivers 217.3 pts/$ vs 87.3 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ — making the Core 2 Duo T5750 the 85.4% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5750Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP
$230
Avg Price (30d)
$8-60%
$20
Performance per Dollar
217.3+149%
87.3
Release Date
2008
2008