
Core 2 Duo T5750

Celeron M 540
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T5750 is positioned at rank 28 and the Celeron M 540 is on rank 873, so the Core 2 Duo T5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5750
Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 540
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T5750 | Celeron M 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($8) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T5750 | Celeron M 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+149%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($8) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T5750 and Celeron M 540

Core 2 Duo T5750
The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.

Celeron M 540
The Celeron M 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,744 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo T5750 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 540 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core 2 Duo T5750 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 versus 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M 540 — a 7.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T5750. Both are built on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture using a 65 nm process. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5750 scores 1,738 against the Celeron M 540's 1,744 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron M 540.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T5750 | Celeron M 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+8% | 1.86 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,738 | 1,744 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 360 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 680 | — |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T5750 versus 667 on the Celeron M 540 — the Celeron M 540 supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T5750) and GL960,GM965 (Celeron M 540).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T5750 | Celeron M 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | — |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | 667+33250% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+104857500% | 4 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Core 2 Duo T5750) vs false (Celeron M 540). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron M 540 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T5750 | Celeron M 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | None | false |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At current prices ($8 vs $20), the Core 2 Duo T5750 is $12 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo T5750 delivers 217.3 pts/$ vs 87.2 pts/$ for the Celeron M 540 — making the Core 2 Duo T5750 the 85.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T5750 | Celeron M 540 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $86 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8-60% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 217.3+149% | 87.2 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















