Core 2 Duo T7300 vs Celeron B710
Core 2 Duo T7300
Celeron B710
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7300 is positioned at rank 283 and the Celeron B710 is on rank 811, so the Core 2 Duo T7300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7300
Performance Per Dollar Celeron B710
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7300 | Celeron B710 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7300 | Celeron B710 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7300 and Celeron B710
Core 2 Duo T7300
The Core 2 Duo T7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,040 points. Launch price was $234.
Celeron B710
The Celeron B710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $70.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo T7300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron B710 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core 2 Duo T7300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7300 versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B710 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T7300 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7300 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron B710 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7300 scores 2,040 against the Celeron B710's 2,051 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron B710. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,499 vs 196 (178.8% advantage for the Core 2 Duo T7300). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7300 vs 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B710.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7300 | Celeron B710 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+25% | 1.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz+25% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,040 | 2,051 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 231 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,499+1685% | 196 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T7300 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron B710 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7300 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B710 — the Celeron B710 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7300) and HM65,HM67 (Celeron B710).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7300 | Celeron B710 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR3-1333+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron B710 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo T7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7300 targets Budget, Celeron B710 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42; Celeron B710 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7300 | Celeron B710 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo T7300 and Celeron B710
