Core 2 Duo T7300 vs Core 2 Duo SL9600
Core 2 Duo T7300
Core 2 Duo SL9600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7300 is positioned at rank 283 and the Core 2 Duo SL9600 is on rank 1177, so the Core 2 Duo T7300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7300
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SL9600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7300 | Core 2 Duo SL9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($316) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7300 | Core 2 Duo SL9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($316) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7300 and Core 2 Duo SL9600
Core 2 Duo T7300
The Core 2 Duo T7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,040 points. Launch price was $234.
Core 2 Duo SL9600
The Core 2 Duo SL9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,054 points. Launch price was $316.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo T7300 and Core 2 Duo SL9600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7300 versus 2.13 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SL9600 — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo SL9600 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7300 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SL9600 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7300 scores 2,040 against the Core 2 Duo SL9600's 2,054 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo SL9600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7300 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SL9600.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7300 | Core 2 Duo SL9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.13 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.13 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,040 | 2,054 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,499 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T7300 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo SL9600 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7300 versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo SL9600 — the Core 2 Duo SL9600 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7300) and GS45,GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo SL9600).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7300 | Core 2 Duo SL9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR3-1066+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7300) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core 2 Duo SL9600). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7300 targets Budget, Core 2 Duo SL9600 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7300 | Core 2 Duo SL9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo T7300 and Core 2 Duo SL9600
