
Core 2 Duo T7500 vs Celeron G4930T

Core 2 Duo T7500

Celeron G4930T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core 2 Duo T7500 is positioned at rank #88 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7500
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G4930T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Celeron G4930T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Celeron G4930T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+748%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7500 and Celeron G4930T

Core 2 Duo T7500
The Core 2 Duo T7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,308 points. Launch price was $234.

Celeron G4930T
The Celeron G4930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,287 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo T7500 and Celeron G4930T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7500 versus 3 GHz on the Celeron G4930T — a 30.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G4930T (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7500 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron G4930T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7500 scores 2,308 against the Celeron G4930T's 2,287 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7500. Multi-core Geekbench: 507 vs 927 (58.6% advantage for the Celeron G4930T). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7500 vs 2 MB on the Celeron G4930T.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Celeron G4930T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz+36% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 512 kB |
| Process | 65 nm | 14 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,308 | 2,287 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 599 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 507 | 927+83% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T7500 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron G4930T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7500 versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4930T — the Celeron G4930T supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7500) and H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4930T).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Celeron G4930T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR4-2400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron G4930T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core 2 Duo T7500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7500 targets Budget, Celeron G4930T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7500 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U; Celeron G4930T rivals Pentium G5420T.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Celeron G4930T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo T7500 launched at $316 MSRP, while the Celeron G4930T debuted at $42. At current prices ($5 vs $42), the Core 2 Duo T7500 is $37 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo T7500 delivers 461.6 pts/$ vs 54.5 pts/$ for the Celeron G4930T — making the Core 2 Duo T7500 the 157.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Celeron G4930T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $316 | $42-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-88% | $42 |
| Performance per Dollar | 461.6+747% | 54.5 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











