
Core 2 Extreme QX9770

Core i5-3450
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 vs Core i5-3450 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 vs Core i5-3450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 vs Core i5-3450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2008Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 24.5 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
- β76.6% higher power demand at 136W vs 77W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-3450 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-3450
2012Why buy it
- β Costs $1,215 less on MSRP ($184 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- β Delivers 644.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.5 vs 3.3 PassMark/$ ($184 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- β Draws 77W instead of 136W, a 59W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 2500, while Core 2 Extreme QX9770 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Extreme QX9770 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (4,517 vs 4,611).
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Extreme QX9770 better than Core i5-3450?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 vs Core i5-3450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770
The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007β2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 136 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,611 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i5-3450
The Core i5-3450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,517 points. Launch price was $186.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Core i5-3450 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-3450 β a 9% clock advantage for the Core i5-3450 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses the Yorkfield (2007β2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-3450 uses Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 scores 4,611 against the Core i5-3450's 4,517 β a 2.1% lead for the Core 2 Extreme QX9770. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-3450.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 | Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+3% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 6144 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB (total)+4700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Yorkfield (2007β2009) | Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) |
| PassMark | 4,611+2% | 4,517 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,200 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 451 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,583 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-3450 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i5-3450 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 | Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | 1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Extreme QX9770) vs true (Core i5-3450). The Core i5-3450 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 2500), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Extreme QX9770 targets Enthusiast.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 | Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x | true |
| Target Use | Enthusiast | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 was priced at $1399, while the Core i5-3450 came in at $184. On launch pricing ($1399 vs $184), Core i5-3450 was $1215 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 delivers 3.3 pts/$ vs 24.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-3450 β making the Core i5-3450 the 152.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 | Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1399 | $184-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3 | 24.5+642% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














