Core 2 Extreme QX9770 vs FX-6350
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
FX-6350
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is positioned at rank 1088 and the FX-6350 is on rank 541, so the FX-6350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Performance Per Dollar FX-6350
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,399) | ✅ More affordable ($55) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2460%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,399) | ✅ More affordable ($55) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and FX-6350
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 136 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,611 points. Launch price was $249.
FX-6350
The FX-6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,640 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6350 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6350 — a 27% clock advantage for the FX-6350 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the FX-6350 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 scores 4,611 against the FX-6350's 4,640 — a 0.6% lead for the FX-6350.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+31% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB (total)+100% | 6144 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 4,611 | 4,640 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 451 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,583 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the FX-6350 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Extreme QX9770) / not specified (FX-6350). Primary use case: Core 2 Extreme QX9770 targets Enthusiast.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast | — |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 launched at $1399 MSRP, while the FX-6350 debuted at $132. At current prices ($1399 vs $55), the FX-6350 is $1344 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 delivers 3.3 pts/$ vs 84.4 pts/$ for the FX-6350 — making the FX-6350 the 185% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1399 | $132-91% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1399 | $55-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3 | 84.4+2458% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and FX-6350
