
Core 2 Extreme QX9770

FX-6350
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 vs FX-6350 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 vs FX-6350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 vs FX-6350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2008Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,611 vs 4,640).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 35.2 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $132 MSRP).
FX-6350
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,267 less on MSRP ($132 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 966.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.2 vs 3.3 PassMark/$ ($132 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 136W, a 11W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is FX-6350 better than Core 2 Extreme QX9770?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 vs FX-6350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770
The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 136 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,611 points. Launch price was $249.

FX-6350
The FX-6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,640 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6350 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6350 — a 27% clock advantage for the FX-6350 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the FX-6350 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 scores 4,611 against the FX-6350's 4,640 — a 0.6% lead for the FX-6350.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+31% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB (total)+100% | 6144 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 4,611 | 4,640 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 451 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,583 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the FX-6350 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Extreme QX9770) / not specified (FX-6350). Primary use case: Core 2 Extreme QX9770 targets Enthusiast.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 was priced at $1399, while the FX-6350 came in at $132. On launch pricing ($1399 vs $132), FX-6350 was $1267 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 delivers 3.3 pts/$ vs 35.2 pts/$ for the FX-6350 — making the FX-6350 the 165.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1399 | $132-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3 | 35.2+967% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















