Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Athlon II X3 425
Core 2 Quad Q9000
Athlon II X3 425
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Quad Q9000 is positioned at rank 1216 and the Athlon II X3 425 is on rank 792, so the Athlon II X3 425 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q9000
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X3 425
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Athlon II X3 425 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Rana (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Athlon II X3 425 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+200%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Athlon II X3 425
Core 2 Quad Q9000
The Core 2 Quad Q9000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,597 points. Launch price was $348.
Athlon II X3 425
The Athlon II X3 425 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,595 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Quad Q9000 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X3 425 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9000 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9000 versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X3 425 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 425 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9000 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II X3 425 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9000 scores 1,597 against the Athlon II X3 425's 1,595 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q9000. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 425.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Athlon II X3 425 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+33% | 3 / 3 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Rana (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,597 | 1,595 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Quad Q9000 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon II X3 425 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Athlon II X3 425 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Quad Q9000 launched at $348 MSRP, while the Athlon II X3 425 debuted at $79. At current prices ($15 vs $5), the Athlon II X3 425 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q9000 delivers 106.5 pts/$ vs 319.0 pts/$ for the Athlon II X3 425 — making the Athlon II X3 425 the 99.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Athlon II X3 425 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $348 | $79-77% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $5-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 106.5 | 319.0+200% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Athlon II X3 425
