Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Core i5-13600K
Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core i5-13600K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core 2 Quad Q9000 is positioned at rank #1216 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q9000
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13600K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+11%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core i5-13600K
Core 2 Quad Q9000
The Core 2 Quad Q9000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,597 points. Launch price was $348.
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Quad Q9000 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13600K offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9000 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K — a 87.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9000 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-13600K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9000 scores 1,597 against the Core i5-13600K's 37,655 — a 183.7% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 14 / 20+250% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 5.1 GHz+155% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | Intel 7 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 1,597 | 37,655+2258% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Quad Q9000 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-13600K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 5.0+355% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Quad Q9000) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core 2 Quad Q9000 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Quad Q9000 launched at $348 MSRP, while the Core i5-13600K debuted at $329. At current prices ($15 vs $319), the Core 2 Quad Q9000 is $304 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q9000 delivers 106.5 pts/$ vs 118.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-13600K — making the Core i5-13600K the 10.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $348 | $329-5% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-95% | $319 |
| Performance per Dollar | 106.5 | 118.0+11% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Core i5-13600K
