Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Core 2 Solo SU3300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is positioned at rank 1211 and the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is on rank 1098, so the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Solo SU3300
Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+0%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Core 2 Solo SU3300
The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,247 points. Launch price was $262.
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $134.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Solo SU3300 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 — identical boost frequencies. Both are built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Core 2 Solo SU3300 scores 1,247 against the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300's 1,250 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,247 | 1,250 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 150 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 280 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the BGA956 socket with PCIe 1.1. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 versus DDR3-800 on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 — the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Core 2 Solo SU3300) vs 2 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300). PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Solo SU3300) vs 6 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) — the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 6 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Primary use case: Core 2 Solo SU3300 targets Mobile, Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 targets Legacy Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 rivals Pentium SU4100.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Mobile | Legacy Mobile |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Solo SU3300 launched at $262 MSRP, while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 debuted at $134. At current prices ($50 vs $50), the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Solo SU3300 delivers 24.9 pts/$ vs 25.0 pts/$ for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 — making the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 the 0.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $262 | $134-49% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.9 | 25.0 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
