Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Turion II Neo K625

Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Turion II Neo K625 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Solo SU3300

1 / 1

1,247

+0.5%

1,241

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Turion II Neo K625 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Turion II Neo K625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Solo SU3300

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $262 MSRP, while Turion II Neo K625 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌200% higher power demand at 3W vs 1W.

Turion II Neo K625

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 3W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,241 vs 1,247).

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II Neo K625 better than Core 2 Solo SU3300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion II Neo K625 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Solo SU3300 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Solo SU3300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II Neo K625 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Turion II Neo K625 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $262 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Solo SU3300 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.2% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion II Neo K625 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Turion II Neo K625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Solo SU3300

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,247 points. Launch price was $262.

Turion II Neo K625

The Turion II Neo K625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,241 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Turion II Neo K625 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Turion II Neo K625 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 versus 1.5 GHz on the Turion II Neo K625 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Turion II Neo K625. The Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion II Neo K625 uses Geneva (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Solo SU3300 scores 1,247 against the Turion II Neo K625's 1,241 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Solo SU3300.

Feature	Core 2 Solo SU3300	Turion II Neo K625
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	1.5 GHz+25%
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Geneva (2010)
PassMark	1,247	1,241

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion II Neo K625 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.