
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

Core 2 Solo SU3300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
2009Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $128 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 96.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.3 vs 4.8 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 3W, a 2W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core 2 Solo SU3300
2008Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,247 vs 1,250).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 9.3 PassMark/$ ($262 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 3W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 better than Core 2 Solo SU3300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $134.

Core 2 Solo SU3300
The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,247 points. Launch price was $262.
Processing Power
The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 versus 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 — identical boost frequencies. Both are built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 scores 1,250 against the Core 2 Solo SU3300's 1,247 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,250 | 1,247 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 150 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 280 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the BGA956 socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to DDR3-800 memory speed. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) vs 1 (Core 2 Solo SU3300). PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) vs 0 (Core 2 Solo SU3300) — the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-800 | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 6 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 targets Legacy Mobile, Core 2 Solo SU3300 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 rivals Pentium SU4100.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Legacy Mobile | Mobile |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 was priced at $134, while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 came in at $262. On launch pricing ($134 vs $262), Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 was $128 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 delivers 9.3 pts/$ vs 4.8 pts/$ for the Core 2 Solo SU3300 — making the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 the 64.9% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 | Core 2 Solo SU3300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $134-49% | $262 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.3+94% | 4.8 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














