Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core 2 Solo SU3300

1 Cores1 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2009

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $128 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
  • Delivers 96.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.3 vs 4.8 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
  • Draws 1W instead of 3W, a 2W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core 2 Solo SU3300

2008

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,247 vs 1,250).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 9.3 PassMark/$ ($262 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
    • 200% higher power demand at 3W vs 1W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 better than Core 2 Solo SU3300?
    Yes. Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the better buy right now. Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 comes in $128 cheaper on MSRP at $134 MSRP versus $262 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 96.0% better value on MSRP (9.3 vs 4.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

    The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $134.

    Intel

    Core 2 Solo SU3300

    The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,247 points. Launch price was $262.

    Processing Power

    The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 versus 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 — identical boost frequencies. Both are built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 scores 1,250 against the Core 2 Solo SU3300's 1,247 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300.

    FeatureCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Core 2 Solo SU3300
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2+100%
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.2 GHz
    1.2 GHz
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    3 MB+200%
    Process
    45 nm
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Penryn (2008−2011)
    Penryn (2008−2011)
    PassMark
    1,250
    1,247
    Geekbench 6 Single
    150
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    280
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the BGA956 socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to DDR3-800 memory speed. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) vs 1 (Core 2 Solo SU3300). PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) vs 0 (Core 2 Solo SU3300) — the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

    FeatureCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Core 2 Solo SU3300
    Socket
    BGA956
    BGA956
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-800
    DDR2-800
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    4 GB
    RAM Channels
    2+100%
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    6
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 targets Legacy Mobile, Core 2 Solo SU3300 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 rivals Pentium SU4100.

    FeatureCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Core 2 Solo SU3300
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x
    VT-x
    Target Use
    Legacy Mobile
    Mobile
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 was priced at $134, while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 came in at $262. On launch pricing ($134 vs $262), Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 was $128 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 delivers 9.3 pts/$ vs 4.8 pts/$ for the Core 2 Solo SU3300 — making the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 the 64.9% better value option.

    FeatureCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Core 2 Solo SU3300
    MSRP
    $134-49%
    $262
    Performance per Dollar
    9.3+94%
    4.8
    Release Date
    2009
    2008

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.