Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Pentium N3700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Pentium N3700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Pentium N3700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Solo SU3300

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 3W instead of 6W, a 3W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,247 vs 1,248).
❌Launch MSRP is still $262 MSRP, while Pentium N3700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium N3700

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 6W vs 3W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N3700 better than Core 2 Solo SU3300?

Yes. Pentium N3700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 35 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium N3700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 35 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium N3700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium N3700 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Pentium N3700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $262 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 35 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Solo SU3300 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Pentium N3700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Solo SU3300

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,247 points. Launch price was $262.

Pentium N3700

The Pentium N3700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,248 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium N3700 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3700 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium N3700 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Pentium N3700. The Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium N3700 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Solo SU3300 scores 1,247 against the Pentium N3700's 1,248 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium N3700.

Feature	Core 2 Solo SU3300	Pentium N3700
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+100%
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,247	1,248

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium N3700 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Solo SU3300	Pentium N3700
Socket	BGA956	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—