Core 2 Solo SU3300
VS
Pentium G6950

Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Pentium G6950

Intel

Core 2 Solo SU3300

1 Cores1 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Pentium G6950

2 Cores2 Thrd73 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is positioned at rank 1211 and the Pentium G6950 is on rank 909, so the Pentium G6950 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Solo SU3300

#1199
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6164%
#1200
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
6074%
#1201
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5576%
#1202
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5550%
#1203
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5500%
#1205
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5311%
#1206
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5092%
#1207
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5084%
#1208
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4947%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
100%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
98%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
96%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
96%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
96%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
93%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
93%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
88%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
86%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
85%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
85%
#1226
C-30
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G6950

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21662%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20468%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
14862%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4477%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3546%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3102%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1777%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1754%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1597%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1597%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1579%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1536%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1515%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1509%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1495%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
97%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
100%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
100%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
99%
#913
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
99%
#914
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
99%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
98%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
98%
#919
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
97%
#920
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
97%
#921
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
97%
#922
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
97%
#923
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium G6950 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Solo SU3300 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Solo SU3300Pentium G6950
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium G6950 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 50% cheaper ($25 vs $50) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore 2 Solo SU3300Pentium G6950
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+101%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Pentium G6950

Intel

Core 2 Solo SU3300

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,247 points. Launch price was $262.

Intel

Pentium G6950

The Pentium G6950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,252 points. Launch price was $60.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium G6950 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium G6950 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G6950 — a 80% clock advantage for the Pentium G6950. The Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G6950 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Solo SU3300 scores 1,247 against the Pentium G6950's 1,252 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium G6950.

FeatureCore 2 Solo SU3300Pentium G6950
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
2.8 GHz+133%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
3 MB+1100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,247
1,252
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G6950 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Solo SU3300Pentium G6950
Socket
BGA956
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Solo SU3300) / not specified (Pentium G6950). Primary use case: Core 2 Solo SU3300 targets Mobile.

FeatureCore 2 Solo SU3300Pentium G6950
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 launched at $262 MSRP, while the Pentium G6950 debuted at $87. At current prices ($50 vs $25), the Pentium G6950 is $25 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Solo SU3300 delivers 24.9 pts/$ vs 50.1 pts/$ for the Pentium G6950 — making the Pentium G6950 the 67% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Solo SU3300Pentium G6950
MSRP
$262
$87-67%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$25-50%
Performance per Dollar
24.9
50.1+101%
Release Date
2008
2010