Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Pentium G645T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Pentium G645T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Pentium G645T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Solo SU3300

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 35W, a 32W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($262 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).

Pentium G645T

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $198 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
✅Delivers 306.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 4.8 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,238 vs 1,247).
❌1066.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 3W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G645T better than Core 2 Solo SU3300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G645T is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Solo SU3300 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Solo SU3300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G645T is the better buy right now. Pentium G645T comes in $198 cheaper on MSRP at $64 MSRP versus $262 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Solo SU3300 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 306.4% better value on MSRP (19.3 vs 4.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G645T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Pentium G645T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Solo SU3300

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,247 points. Launch price was $262.

Pentium G645T

The Pentium G645T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,238 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium G645T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium G645T has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 versus 2.5 GHz on the Pentium G645T — a 70.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G645T. The Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G645T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Solo SU3300 scores 1,247 against the Pentium G645T's 1,238 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Solo SU3300.

Feature	Core 2 Solo SU3300	Pentium G645T
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	2.5 GHz+108%
Base Clock	—	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	3 MB+1100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,247	1,238

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G645T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Solo SU3300	Pentium G645T
Socket	BGA956	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Solo SU3300) / not specified (Pentium G645T). Primary use case: Core 2 Solo SU3300 targets Mobile.

Feature	Core 2 Solo SU3300	Pentium G645T
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Mobile	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Solo SU3300 was priced at $262, while the Pentium G645T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($262 vs $64), Pentium G645T was $198 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Solo SU3300 delivers 4.8 pts/$ vs 19.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G645T — making the Pentium G645T the 121% better value option.

Feature	Core 2 Solo SU3300	Pentium G645T
MSRP	$262	$64-76%
Performance per Dollar	4.8	19.3+302%
Release Date	2008	2012

Search Core 2 Solo SU3300 on Amazon

Search Pentium G645T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.