
Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Ryzen 7 5700X

Core 2 Solo SU3300

Ryzen 7 5700X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is positioned at rank #1211 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Solo SU3300
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 5700X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($175) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+510%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($175) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen 7 5700X

Core 2 Solo SU3300
The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,247 points. Launch price was $262.

Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Solo SU3300 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5700X has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 117.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X. The Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Solo SU3300 scores 1,247 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 182.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 8 / 16+700% |
| Boost Clock | 1.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz+283% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 7 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 1,247 | 26,609+2034% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the Ryzen 7 5700X supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Core 2 Solo SU3300) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X). PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Solo SU3300) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 4.0+264% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR4-3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 128 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Solo SU3300) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Core 2 Solo SU3300 targets Mobile, Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mobile | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Solo SU3300 launched at $262 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5700X debuted at $299. At current prices ($50 vs $175), the Core 2 Solo SU3300 is $125 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Solo SU3300 delivers 24.9 pts/$ vs 152.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 143.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $262-12% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-71% | $175 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.9 | 152.1+511% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















