
Core 2 Solo SU3300

Ryzen 7 5700X
Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Solo SU3300
2008Why buy it
- β Costs $37 less on MSRP ($262 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- β Draws 3W instead of 65W, a 62W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,247 vs 26,609).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($262 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +687.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Delivers 1769.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 4.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β14.1% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$262 MSRP
- β2066.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 3W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Core 2 Solo SU3300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Solo SU3300
The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008β2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,247 points. Launch price was $262.


Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Solo SU3300 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 5700X has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X β a 117.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X. The Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses the Penryn (2008β2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Solo SU3300 scores 1,247 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 β a 182.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 8 / 16+700% |
| Boost Clock | 1.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz+283% |
| Base Clock | β | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | β | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 512K (per core)+16967% |
| Process | 45 nm | 7 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008β2011) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) |
| PassMark | 1,247 | 26,609+2034% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X β the Ryzen 7 5700X supports 300% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB β 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Core 2 Solo SU3300) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X). PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Solo SU3300) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) β the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 4.0+264% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR4-3200+300% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 128 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Solo SU3300) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Core 2 Solo SU3300 targets Mobile, Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mobile | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Solo SU3300 was priced at $262, while the Ryzen 7 5700X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($262 vs $299), Core 2 Solo SU3300 was $37 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Solo SU3300 delivers 4.8 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X β making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 179.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Solo SU3300 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $262-12% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8 | 89.0+1754% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














