
Core i3-10100F

Ryzen 3 7320U
Core i3-10100F vs Ryzen 3 7320U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-10100F vs Ryzen 3 7320U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-10100F vs Ryzen 3 7320U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-10100F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $88 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7320U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 7320U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 3 7320U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Core i3-10100F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10100F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,627 vs 8,714).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 15W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-10100F better than Ryzen 3 7320U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10100F vs Ryzen 3 7320U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10100F
The Core i3-10100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,714 points. Launch price was $122.


Ryzen 3 7320U
The Ryzen 3 7320U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,627 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-10100F and Ryzen 3 7320U share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-10100F versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7320U — a 4.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-10100F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-10100F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 7320U uses Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10100F scores 8,714 against the Ryzen 3 7320U's 8,627 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-10100F. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i3-10100F vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7320U.
| Feature | Core i3-10100F | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+5% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+50% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) |
| PassMark | 8,714+1% | 8,627 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 4,907 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,213 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,589 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10100F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 7320U uses FT6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10100F versus LPDDR5-5500 on the Ryzen 3 7320U — the Ryzen 3 7320U supports 106.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-10100F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-10100F) vs 4 (Ryzen 3 7320U) — the Core i3-10100F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 400 series (Core i3-10100F) and FT6 (Ryzen 3 7320U).
| Feature | Core i3-10100F | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FT6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | LPDDR5-5500+106% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+700% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+300% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-10100F) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 7320U). The Ryzen 3 7320U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Core i3-10100F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 7320U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen 3 7320U rivals Core i3-1215U.
| Feature | Core i3-10100F | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













