Core i3-10100F vs Xeon E5-2670
Core i3-10100F
Xeon E5-2670
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-10100F
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2670
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-10100F | Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($60) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-10100F | Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+17%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($60) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-10100F and Xeon E5-2670
Core i3-10100F
The Core i3-10100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,714 points. Launch price was $122.
Xeon E5-2670
The Xeon E5-2670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,901 points. Launch price was $145.
Processing Power
The Core i3-10100F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2670 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2670 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-10100F versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2670 — a 26.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-10100F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-10100F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2670 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10100F scores 8,714 against the Xeon E5-2670's 8,901 — a 2.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2670. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i3-10100F vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2670.
| Feature | Core i3-10100F | Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+30% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+38% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 20480 kB (total)+233% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 8,714 | 8,901+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10100F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2670 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10100F versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-2670 — the Core i3-10100F supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2670 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-10100F) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2670). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-10100F) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2670) — the Xeon E5-2670 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 400 series (Core i3-10100F) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2670).
| Feature | Core i3-10100F | Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+33% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 384 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-10100F) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2670). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2670 targets Server.
| Feature | Core i3-10100F | Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-10100F launched at $88 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2670 debuted at $1552. At current prices ($50 vs $60), the Core i3-10100F is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10100F delivers 174.3 pts/$ vs 148.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2670 — making the Core i3-10100F the 16.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-10100F | Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $88-94% | $1552 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-17% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 174.3+18% | 148.3 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-10100F and Xeon E5-2670
