Core i3-10100F vs Ryzen 5 3400GE

Core i3-10100F vs Ryzen 5 3400GE Performance Spectrum

Core i3-10100F

4 / 8

8,714

0.0%

8,825

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10100F vs Ryzen 5 3400GE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10100F vs Ryzen 5 3400GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10100F

2020

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($88 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 67.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 99.0 vs 59.2 PassMark/$ ($88 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,714 vs 8,825).

Ryzen 5 3400GE

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 59.2 vs 99.0 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $88 MSRP).
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10100F better than Ryzen 5 3400GE?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-10100F is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3400GE pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Core i3-10100F also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3400GE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10100F is the better buy right now. Core i3-10100F comes in $61 cheaper on MSRP at $88 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen 5 3400GE is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. It is also 67.2% better value on MSRP (99.0 vs 59.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 3400GE can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10100F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10100F vs Ryzen 5 3400GE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10100F

The Core i3-10100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,714 points. Launch price was $122.

Ryzen 5 3400GE

The Ryzen 5 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 8,825 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10100F and Ryzen 5 3400GE share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-10100F versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3400GE — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-10100F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i3-10100F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3400GE uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10100F scores 8,714 against the Ryzen 5 3400GE's 8,825 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3400GE. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i3-10100F vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3400GE.

Feature	Core i3-10100F	Ryzen 5 3400GE
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+7%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+9%	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	8,714	8,825+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10100F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3400GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10100F	Ryzen 5 3400GE
Socket	LGA1200	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-10100F was priced at $88, while the Ryzen 5 3400GE came in at $149. On launch pricing ($88 vs $149), Core i3-10100F was $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10100F delivers 99.0 pts/$ vs 59.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3400GE — making the Core i3-10100F the 50.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-10100F	Ryzen 5 3400GE
MSRP	$88-41%	$149
Performance per Dollar	99.0+67%	59.2
Release Date	2020	2019

Search Core i3-10100F on Amazon

Search Ryzen 5 3400GE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.