Core i3-10110U vs PRO A12-8870

Core i3-10110U vs PRO A12-8870 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-10110U

2 / 4

3,839

+0.9%

3,805

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10110U vs PRO A12-8870 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10110U vs PRO A12-8870: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10110U

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 10th Gen, while PRO A12-8870 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A12-8870 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

PRO A12-8870

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,805 vs 3,839).
❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10110U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10110U better than PRO A12-8870?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A12-8870 is ahead with a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10110U pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10110U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10110U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-10110U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10110U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-10110U vs PRO A12-8870 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10110U

The Core i3-10110U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,839 points. Launch price was $69.

PRO A12-8870

The PRO A12-8870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,805 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10110U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A12-8870 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A12-8870 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-10110U versus 4.2 GHz on the PRO A12-8870 — a 2.4% clock advantage for the PRO A12-8870 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i3-10110U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A12-8870 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10110U scores 3,839 against the PRO A12-8870's 3,805 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-10110U.

Feature	Core i3-10110U	PRO A12-8870
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	4.2 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.7 GHz+76%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	3,839	3,805
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,327	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,270	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,353	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10110U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A12-8870 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10110U	PRO A12-8870
Socket	FCBGA1528	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-10110U) / not specified (PRO A12-8870). The Core i3-10110U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 10th Gen), while the PRO A12-8870 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-10110U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i3-10110U rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.