Core i3-1110G4
VS
FX-6200

Core i3-1110G4 vs FX-6200

Intel

Core i3-1110G4

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020
VS
AMD

FX-6200

6 Cores6 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-1110G4 is positioned at rank 985 and the FX-6200 is on rank 701, so the FX-6200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-1110G4

#973
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1982%
#974
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1953%
#975
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1793%
#976
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1785%
#977
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1769%
#979
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1708%
#980
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1638%
#981
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1635%
#982
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1591%
#985
Core i3-1110G4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#986
Pro A8-8600B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
99%
#991
Pentium 8500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
98%
#992
A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16
98%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
97%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
97%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
95%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
95%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#999
3015Ce
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
95%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6200

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12807%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12101%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8786%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2647%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2097%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1834%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1051%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1037%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
944%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
944%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
933%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
908%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
896%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
892%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
884%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
98%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
100%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
100%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
99%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
99%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
99%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
99%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
98%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
98%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
97%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
97%
#715
Core i5-6500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $123
96%
#716
Core i7-4770T
MSRP: $250|Avg: $39
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-1110G4 (2020) utilizes 10 nm SuperFin technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-1110G4FX-6200
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) / 10 nm SuperFin)
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6200 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-1110G4FX-6200
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-1110G4 and FX-6200

Intel

Core i3-1110G4

The Core i3-1110G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,160 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

FX-6200

The FX-6200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 February 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,114 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i3-1110G4 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6200 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6200 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1110G4 versus 4.1 GHz on the FX-6200 — a 5% clock advantage for the FX-6200 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i3-1110G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the FX-6200 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1110G4 scores 4,160 against the FX-6200's 4,114 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-1110G4. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1110G4 vs 8192 kB on the FX-6200.

FeatureCore i3-1110G4FX-6200
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4.1 GHz+5%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
3.8 GHz+111%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8192 kB+33%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
6144 kB+380%
Process
10 nm SuperFin-69%
32 nm
Architecture
Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
4,160+1%
4,114
Geekbench 6 Single
1,491
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1110G4 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the FX-6200 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-1110G4FX-6200
Socket
FCBGA1598
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+100%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4x-4267
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1110G4) / not specified (FX-6200). The Core i3-1110G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)), while the FX-6200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1110G4 targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1110G4 rivals Ryzen 3 4300U.

FeatureCore i3-1110G4FX-6200
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Thin & Light Laptop