Core i3-1110G4 vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

Core i3-1110G4 vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Performance Spectrum

Core i3-1110G4

2 / 4

4,160

+0.8%

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

8 / 8

4,125

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1110G4 vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1110G4 vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1110G4

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU), while MediaTek Kompanio 1300T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,125 vs 4,160).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1110G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-1110G4 better than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is ahead with a 17.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1110G4 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1110G4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-1110G4 still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-1110G4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-1110G4 vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1110G4

The Core i3-1110G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,160 points. Launch price was $69.

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

The MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 9 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. Built on 6 nm process technology. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,125 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1110G4 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1110G4 versus 2.6 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i3-1110G4 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-1110G4 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T uses Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1110G4 scores 4,160 against the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T's 4,125 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-1110G4.

Feature	Core i3-1110G4	MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+50%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	10 nm SuperFin	6 nm-40%
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024)
PassMark	4,160	4,125
Geekbench 6 Single	1,491	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1110G4) / not specified (MediaTek Kompanio 1300T). The Core i3-1110G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)), while the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1110G4 targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1110G4 rivals Ryzen 3 4300U.