
Core i3-12100

Xeon E5-2692 v2
Core i3-12100 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-12100 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-12100 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-12100
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 60W instead of 100W, a 40W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 730, while Xeon E5-2692 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2692 v2, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2692 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2692 v2
2013Why buy it
- β +150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-12100 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (12,119 vs 12,315).
- β66.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 60W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA2011, while Core i3-12100 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i3-12100 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-12100 better than Xeon E5-2692 v2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-12100 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-12100
The Core i3-12100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 12,315 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2692 v2
The Xeon E5-2692 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,119 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i3-12100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Xeon E5-2692 v2 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-12100 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2692 v2 β a 35.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-12100 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-12100 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-12100 scores 12,315 against the Xeon E5-2692 v2's 12,119 β a 1.6% lead for the Core i3-12100. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-12100 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2692 v2.
| Feature | Core i3-12100 | Xeon E5-2692 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 12 / 24+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+43% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+50% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 12,315+2% | 12,119 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,157 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-12100 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-12100 | Xeon E5-2692 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-12100) / not specified (Xeon E5-2692 v2). The Core i3-12100 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 730), while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-12100 targets Budget Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-12100 rivals Ryzen 5 5500.
| Feature | Core i3-12100 | Xeon E5-2692 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 730 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Budget Gaming Desktop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













