PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-13100F vs Core i5-11600T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-13100F vs Core i5-11600T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-13100F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $153 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
✅Delivers 143.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 134.4 vs 55.1 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌65.7% higher power demand at 58W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-11600T

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 58W, a 23W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 750, while Core i3-13100F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-13100F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (6,455 vs 7,577).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 55.1 vs 134.4 PassMark/$ ($262 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-13100F better than Core i5-11600T?

Yes. Core i3-13100F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 17.4% better Geekbench multi-core, 1.4% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-13100F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-13100F is the stronger fit. You are getting 17.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-13100F is the better buy right now. Core i3-13100F comes in $153 cheaper on MSRP at $109 MSRP versus $262 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 143.7% better value on MSRP (134.4 vs 55.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-11600T can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-13100F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-13100F vs Core i5-11600T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100F

The Core i3-13100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,649 points. Launch price was $109.

Core i5-11600T

The Core i5-11600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,447 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-13100F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-11600T offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-11600T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-13100F versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-11600T — a 9.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-13100F (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i3-13100F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-11600T uses Rocket Lake (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100F scores 14,649 against the Core i5-11600T's 14,447 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i3-13100F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,272 vs 1,856, a 20.2% lead for the Core i3-13100F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,577 vs 6,455 (16% advantage for the Core i3-13100F). Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-13100F	Core i5-11600T
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+10%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+100%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Rocket Lake (2021)
PassMark	14,649+1%	14,447
Geekbench 6 Single	2,272+22%	1,856
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,577+17%	6,455

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-13100F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-11600T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i3-13100F versus DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-11600T — the Core i3-13100F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-13100F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i3-13100F) and H470,Z490,B560,Z590 (Core i5-11600T).

Feature	Core i3-13100F	Core i5-11600T
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+50%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-11600T includes integrated graphics (UHD 750), while the Core i3-13100F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11600T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11600T rivals Ryzen 5 5600G.

Feature	Core i3-13100F	Core i5-11600T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD 750
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-13100F was priced at $109, while the Core i5-11600T came in at $262. On launch pricing ($109 vs $262), Core i3-13100F was $153 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-13100F delivers 134.4 pts/$ vs 55.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-11600T — making the Core i3-13100F the 83.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-13100F	Core i5-11600T
MSRP	$109-58%	$262
Performance per Dollar	134.4+144%	55.1
Release Date	2023	2021

Search Core i3-13100F on Amazon

Search Core i5-11600T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.