Core i3-13100F vs Xeon E5-2658 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-13100F vs Xeon E5-2658 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-13100F vs Xeon E5-2658 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-13100F

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 58W instead of 105W, a 47W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011-3 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2658 v4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2658 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2658 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $109 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2658 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2658 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,434 vs 14,649).
❌81% higher power demand at 105W vs 58W.
❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-13100F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-13100F better than Xeon E5-2658 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2658 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-13100F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-13100F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-13100F is the better buy right now. Core i3-13100F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $109 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2658 v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (134.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-13100F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA2011-3, more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 14/28, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-13100F vs Xeon E5-2658 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100F

The Core i3-13100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,649 points. Launch price was $109.

Xeon E5-2658 v4

The Xeon E5-2658 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,434 points. Launch price was $1,832.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-13100F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2658 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2658 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-13100F versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658 v4 — a 64.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-13100F. The Core i3-13100F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2658 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100F scores 14,649 against the Xeon E5-2658 v4's 14,434 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i3-13100F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-13100F vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2658 v4.

Feature	Core i3-13100F	Xeon E5-2658 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	14 / 28+250%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+96%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	35 MB+192%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	3.5 MB+180%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	14,649+1%	14,434
Geekbench 6 Single	2,272	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,577	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-13100F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2658 v4 uses FCLGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-13100F	Xeon E5-2658 v4
Socket	LGA1700	FCLGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—