Core i3-2357M vs Core i3-3110M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2357M vs Core i3-3110M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2357M vs Core i3-3110M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2357M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 512W, a 495W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (440 vs 846).

Core i3-3110M

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌2911.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-3110M better than Core i3-2357M?

Yes. Core i3-3110M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 92.3% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.7% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-3110M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3110M is the stronger fit. You are getting 92.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-3110M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-3110M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-3110M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-2357M vs Core i3-3110M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2357M

The Core i3-2357M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,645 points. Launch price was $250.

Core i3-3110M

The Core i3-3110M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,656 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-2357M and Core i3-3110M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2357M versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-3110M — a 59.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-3110M (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-2357M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-3110M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2357M scores 1,645 against the Core i3-3110M's 1,656 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-3110M. Multi-core Geekbench: 440 vs 846 (63.1% advantage for the Core i3-3110M). Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-2357M	Core i3-3110M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+85%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+85%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,645	1,656
Cinebench R23 Multi	440	—
Geekbench 6 Single	—	424
Geekbench 6 Multi	440	846+92%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2357M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-3110M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i3-2357M versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3110M — the Core i3-3110M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3110M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i3-2357M) and HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77 (Core i3-3110M).

Feature	Core i3-2357M	Core i3-3110M
Socket	BGA1023	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333	DDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i3-2357M) vs VT-x (Core i3-3110M). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2357M) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3110M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3110M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-2357M rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600; Core i3-3110M rivals AMD A8-4500M.