A10-4655M vs Core i3-2357M

A10-4655M vs Core i3-2357M Performance Spectrum

A10-4655M

4 / 4

1,654

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-2357M

2 / 4

1,645

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-2357M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-2357M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4655M

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌47.1% higher power demand at 25W vs 17W.

Core i3-2357M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 25W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,645 vs 1,654).

Quick Answers

So, is A10-4655M better than Core i3-2357M?

Yes. A10-4655M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-4655M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-4655M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-4655M still makes the most sense overall. A10-4655M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-4655M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-2357M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4655M

The A10-4655M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-2357M

The Core i3-2357M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,645 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4655M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-2357M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-4655M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A10-4655M versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2357M — a 73.2% clock advantage for the A10-4655M (base: 2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The A10-4655M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-2357M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4655M scores 1,654 against the Core i3-2357M's 1,645 — a 0.5% lead for the A10-4655M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-4655M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2357M.

Feature	A10-4655M	Core i3-2357M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+115%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+54%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,654	1,645
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	440
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	440

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4655M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-2357M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-4655M) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i3-2357M).

Feature	A10-4655M	Core i3-2357M
Socket	FP2	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333	1333
Max RAM Capacity	16	16
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7620G (A10-4655M) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2357M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-4655M rivals Core i3-4010U; Core i3-2357M rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.