Core i3-2357M vs Core M-5Y10

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2357M vs Core M-5Y10 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2357M vs Core M-5Y10: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2357M

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 17W instead of 512W, a 495W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Core M-5Y10 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Core M-5Y10

2014

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,644 vs 1,645).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Core i3-2357M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2911.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2357M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core M-5Y10 better than Core i3-2357M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core M-5Y10 is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2357M pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core M-5Y10 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2357M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core M-5Y10 is the better buy right now. Core M-5Y10 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-2357M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core M-5Y10 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-2357M vs Core M-5Y10 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2357M

The Core i3-2357M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,645 points. Launch price was $250.

Core M-5Y10

The Core M-5Y10 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,644 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-2357M and Core M-5Y10 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2357M versus 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10 — a 42.4% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y10 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The Core i3-2357M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core M-5Y10 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2357M scores 1,645 against the Core M-5Y10's 1,644 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-2357M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2357M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10.

Feature	Core i3-2357M	Core M-5Y10
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	2 GHz+54%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz+63%	0.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark	1,645	1,644
Cinebench R23 Multi	440	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	440	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2357M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core M-5Y10 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-2357M	Core M-5Y10
Socket	BGA1023	FCBGA1234
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-2357M) / not specified (Core M-5Y10). The Core i3-2357M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core M-5Y10 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-2357M rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.