
Core i3-3130M

Core M-5Y70
Core i3-3130M vs Core M-5Y70 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-3130M vs Core M-5Y70 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-3130M vs Core M-5Y70: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-3130M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $56 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.5 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Core M-5Y70 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
Core M-5Y70
2014Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-3130M across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,890 vs 1,906).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 8.5 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3130M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-3130M better than Core M-5Y70?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-3130M vs Core M-5Y70 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-3130M
The Core i3-3130M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $225.

Core M-5Y70
The Core M-5Y70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,890 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-3130M and Core M-5Y70 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-3130M versus 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y70 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i3-3130M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core M-5Y70 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3130M scores 1,906 against the Core M-5Y70's 1,890 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-3130M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3130M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y70.
| Feature | Core i3-3130M | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+136% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 4 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Broadwell-Y (2014) |
| PassMark | 1,906 | 1,890 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-3130M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core M-5Y70 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-3130M | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | FCBGA1234 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i3-3130M) / not specified (Core M-5Y70). The Core i3-3130M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core M-5Y70 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-3130M rivals AMD A8-4500M.
| Feature | Core i3-3130M | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-3130M was priced at $225, while the Core M-5Y70 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($225 vs $281), Core i3-3130M was $56 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-3130M delivers 8.5 pts/$ vs 6.7 pts/$ for the Core M-5Y70 — making the Core i3-3130M the 23% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-3130M | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225-20% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.5+27% | 6.7 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














