Core i3-3130M vs V-Series V140

Core i3-3130M vs V-Series V140 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-3130M

2 / 4

1,906

0.0%

1,913

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-3130M vs V-Series V140 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-3130M vs V-Series V140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-3130M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while V-Series V140 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,906 vs 1,913).
❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while V-Series V140 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

V-Series V140

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3130M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-3130M better than V-Series V140?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-3130M is ahead with a 0.0% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, V-Series V140 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, V-Series V140 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-3130M is the better buy right now. Core i3-3130M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $225 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that V-Series V140 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-3130M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-3130M vs V-Series V140 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-3130M

The Core i3-3130M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $225.

V-Series V140

The V-Series V140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,913 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-3130M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the V-Series V140 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i3-3130M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-3130M versus 2.3 GHz on the V-Series V140 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-3130M. The Core i3-3130M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the V-Series V140 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3130M scores 1,906 against the V-Series V140's 1,913 — a 0.4% lead for the V-Series V140.

Feature	Core i3-3130M	V-Series V140
Cores / Threads	2 / 4+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+13%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,906	1,913

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3130M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the V-Series V140 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-3130M	V-Series V140
Socket	PGA988	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-3130M) / not specified (V-Series V140). The Core i3-3130M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the V-Series V140 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-3130M rivals AMD A8-4500M.