Core i3-3130M vs Xeon E5507

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-3130M vs Xeon E5507 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-3130M vs Xeon E5507: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-3130M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Xeon E5507 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5507, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Xeon E5507 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌540% higher power demand at 512W vs 80W.

Xeon E5507

2010

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 80W instead of 512W, a 432W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,905 vs 1,906).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3130M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-3130M better than Xeon E5507?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5507 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-3130M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-3130M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3130M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-3130M is the better buy right now. Core i3-3130M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $225 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-3130M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-3130M vs Xeon E5507 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-3130M

The Core i3-3130M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $225.

Xeon E5507

The Xeon E5507 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $457.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-3130M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5507 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5507 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-3130M versus 0.27 GHz on the Xeon E5507 — a 162.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-3130M (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Core i3-3130M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5507 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3130M scores 1,906 against the Xeon E5507's 1,905 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-3130M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3130M vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon E5507.

Feature	Core i3-3130M	Xeon E5507
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+863%	0.27 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+15%	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,906	1,905

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3130M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5507 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-3130M	Xeon E5507
Socket	PGA988	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-3130M) / not specified (Xeon E5507). The Core i3-3130M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon E5507 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-3130M rivals AMD A8-4500M.