PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-3130M vs Pentium Dual Core T2410 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-3130M vs Pentium Dual Core T2410: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-3130M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Pentium Dual Core T2410 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.5 vs 19.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Pentium Dual Core T2410

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $125 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 123.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.0 vs 8.5 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,896 vs 1,906).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3130M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-3130M better than Pentium Dual Core T2410?

Yes. Core i3-3130M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-3130M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 44 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3130M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-3130M is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-3130M comes in 125.0% more expensive on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium Dual Core T2410 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 123.8% better value on paper (19.0 vs 8.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on P.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-3130M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-3130M vs Pentium Dual Core T2410 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-3130M

The Core i3-3130M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $225.

Pentium Dual Core T2410

The Pentium Dual Core T2410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,896 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-3130M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium Dual Core T2410's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-3130M versus 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T2410 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-3130M. The Core i3-3130M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3130M scores 1,906 against the Pentium Dual Core T2410's 1,896 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-3130M.

Feature	Core i3-3130M	Pentium Dual Core T2410
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+30%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,906	1,896

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3130M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i3-3130M versus 667 on the Pentium Dual Core T2410 — the Core i3-3130M supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3130M supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 4 — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i3-3130M) and Socket P (Pentium Dual Core T2410).

Feature	Core i3-3130M	Pentium Dual Core T2410
Socket	PGA988	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1600+140%	667
Max RAM Capacity	32+700%	4
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core i3-3130M) vs false (Pentium Dual Core T2410). The Core i3-3130M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-3130M rivals AMD A8-4500M.

Feature	Core i3-3130M	Pentium Dual Core T2410
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 4000	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	false

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-3130M was priced at $225, while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($225 vs $100), Pentium Dual Core T2410 was $125 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-3130M delivers 8.5 pts/$ vs 19.0 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T2410 — making the Pentium Dual Core T2410 the 76.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-3130M	Pentium Dual Core T2410
MSRP	$225	$100-56%
Performance per Dollar	8.5	19.0+124%
Release Date	2013	2008

Search Core i3-3130M on Amazon

Search Pentium Dual Core T2410 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.