Core i3-3210 vs Celeron G4900T
Core i3-3210
Celeron G4900T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i3-3210 is positioned at rank #814 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3210
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G4900T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-3210 | Celeron G4900T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($25) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-3210 | Celeron G4900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+59%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($25) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3210 and Celeron G4900T
Core i3-3210
The Core i3-3210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,229 points. Launch price was $120.
Celeron G4900T
The Celeron G4900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
The Core i3-3210 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G4900T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-3210 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G4900T — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-3210 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-3210 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G4900T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3210 scores 2,229 against the Celeron G4900T's 2,239 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G4900T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 505 vs 623, a 20.9% lead for the Celeron G4900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,113 vs 1,040 (6.8% advantage for the Core i3-3210). L3 cache: 3072 kB (total) on the Core i3-3210 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900T.
| Feature | Core i3-3210 | Celeron G4900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+10% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+10% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3072 kB (total)+50% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,229 | 2,239 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 505 | 623+23% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,113+7% | 1,040 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-3210 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G4900T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3210 versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4900T — the Celeron G4900T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4900T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B75,H77 (Core i3-3210) and H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4900T).
| Feature | Core i3-3210 | Celeron G4900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR4-2400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 2500 (Core i3-3210) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4900T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3210 targets Budget, Celeron G4900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-3210 rivals Ryzen 3 1200; Celeron G4900T rivals Pentium G5400T.
| Feature | Core i3-3210 | Celeron G4900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 2500 | UHD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-3210 launched at $117 MSRP, while the Celeron G4900T debuted at $42. At current prices ($25 vs $40), the Core i3-3210 is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-3210 delivers 89.2 pts/$ vs 56.0 pts/$ for the Celeron G4900T — making the Core i3-3210 the 45.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-3210 | Celeron G4900T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117 | $42-64% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-38% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.2+59% | 56.0 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-3210 and Celeron G4900T
