Core i3-3210
VS
Pentium P6100

Core i3-3210 vs Pentium P6100

Intel

Core i3-3210

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium P6100

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3210 is positioned at rank 814 and the Pentium P6100 is on rank 825, so the Core i3-3210 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3210

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16363%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15461%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11226%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3382%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2679%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2344%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1342%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1325%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1206%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1206%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1193%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1160%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1144%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1140%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1129%
#814
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
100%
#815
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
100%
#816
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#817
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
99%
#818
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
99%
#819
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
98%
#820
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#821
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
98%
#822
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
97%
#823
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
97%
#824
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
97%
#826
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
97%
#827
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#828
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium P6100

#813
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1307%
#814
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1288%
#815
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1182%
#816
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1177%
#817
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1166%
#819
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1126%
#820
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1080%
#821
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1078%
#822
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1049%
#825
Pentium P6100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16.39
100%
#828
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
99%
#829
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
99%
#835
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#836
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#837
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-3210 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium P6100 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-3210Pentium P6100
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($16.39)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium P6100 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 34% cheaper ($16.39 vs $25) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i3-3210Pentium P6100
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+54%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($16.39)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3210 and Pentium P6100

Intel

Core i3-3210

The Core i3-3210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,229 points. Launch price was $120.

Intel

Pentium P6100

The Pentium P6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $12.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3210 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium P6100's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-3210 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium P6100 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-3210 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-3210 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium P6100 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3210 scores 2,229 against the Pentium P6100's 2,245 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium P6100. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total) on the Core i3-3210 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6100.

FeatureCore i3-3210Pentium P6100
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+60%
2 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+60%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
3072 kB (total)
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
2,229
2,245
Geekbench 6 Single
505
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,113
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3210 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium P6100 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-3210Pentium P6100
Socket
LGA1155
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i3-3210) / not specified (Pentium P6100). The Core i3-3210 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Pentium P6100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3210 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-3210 rivals Ryzen 3 1200.

FeatureCore i3-3210Pentium P6100
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-3210 launched at $117 MSRP, while the Pentium P6100 debuted at $100. At current prices ($25 vs $16.39), the Pentium P6100 is $9 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-3210 delivers 89.2 pts/$ vs 137.0 pts/$ for the Pentium P6100 — making the Pentium P6100 the 42.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-3210Pentium P6100
MSRP
$117
$100-15%
Avg Price (30d)
$25
$16.39-34%
Performance per Dollar
89.2
137.0+54%
Release Date
2013
2010